"> Constituting the ODAM (Online Discourse Analysis Method) PhD thesis by Terrell Neuage at the Unversity of South Australia

12 more days before embarking on our (covid) 15-week world tour: Abu Dhabi (UAR), Lahore Pakistan, Istanbul Turkey, Washington DC, New York City, Oneonta New York, Nieuwerkerk aan den Ijssel & Utrecht Netherlands - return to Australia late March 2022 [what could possibly go wrong]

Terrell Neuage @ #IronicThoughts2021
27 November 2021 today's 1st thought > here
#OurCurrentLifeWithCovid as of (DST) - 27 November 2021

HAPPY 74TH BIRTHDAY TO ME one-hundred-ten days ago
contact me ~ My Resume 

Leaving Australia 'Again': Before the After 
Now in print and delivered to your door Leaving Australia 'Again': Before the After Read the first 45 pages for free
available on these devices (Amazon author page)

HAPPY 74TH BIRTHDAY TO ME seventy-seven days ago

Blog & new ramblings on substack

PhD thesis > 'Conversational Analysis of Chatroom Talk: Online Discourse Analysis' Method Kindle Edition
how we see the world today

#TerrellNeuage PhD Click on image to see photos of Terrell Neuage from 1950 - when I was adopted at age 3 in upstate New York to July 2018 Adelaide, Australia

how we see the world today
youtube videos


previous youtube channel (stories prior to 2013)

'Travel with my ties in Isolation' Album on Behance
video - (ties in isolation)
A cautionary tale
Ties in Isolation
e-books

contact me ~ My Resume 

HOOM video (1969 - 1978 photos)

#Thoughts in Quarantine Images:Twitter ~ Tumblr ~ Pinterest ~ linkedin ~ Flickr (2020) / Flickr (pre-2019)
Behance Project - Thoughts in Semi-Isolation June 2020
2020
Thoughts in Isolation May, April [Adelaide, South Australia], March [The Netherlands], February [Holland], January

Terrell Neuage- charting the ODAM (pdf) - University of South Australia teaching site 

THESIS COMPLETE .pdf

contact me

Conversational Analysis of Chat Room Talk PHD thesis by       Dr. Terrell Neuage  University of South Australia National Library of Australia.

THESIShome ~ Abstract.html/pdf ~ Glossary.html/pdfIntroduction.html/pdf  ~ methodology.html/pdf  ~ literature review.html/pdfCase Study 1.html/pdf~ 2.html/pdf~ 3.html/pdf~  4.html/pdf~ 5.html/pdf~  6.html/pdf~  7.html/pdf~ discussion.html/pdf  ~ conclusion.html~ postscipt.html/pdf~ O*D*A*M.html/pdf~ Bibliography.html/pdf~  911~ thesis-complete.htm/~ Terrell Neuage Home Appendixes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.  DATA ~ Case Study   1 ~ 2 ~ 3 ~ 4 ~ 5 ~ 6 ~ 7 ~ These links are from early notes and not the final edits which are in the published version available at the University of South Australia only. Not all links are active due to changing domains. Home page see https://neuage.co  / https://neuage.us

Acknowledgements

NOW AVAILABLE PUBLISHED 29/12/2017 FROM AMAZON

 

Constituting the ODAM (Online Discourse Analysis Method)

Use of mixed linguistic analysis methodology

Finding strictly regulated language practices

Main feature of online talk: Open/Creative practices

Main features of online talk communities – relational talk

 

Charting ODAM

ODAM

 

Building inwards from the broad user-perspectives of Reader Response, examining chat postings as actively received interpreted “wreaderly” communication, the ODAM has cut four deep and “rich descriptive” wedges from a multi-dimensional, multi-leveled set of chat actions. Beginning simply on an empirically driven arm: to cut into actual instances of chat practice using any existing research methods which could examine how online talk “works”. The study can now be seen to offer in the first instance, a set of interlocking research tools, any or all of which can be picked  up, critiqued and re-applied, to be improved upon in future studies, by future researchers.

A second “wedge” or cut from the research findings however establishes that a key direction in linguistic research methodologies: the drive towards establishing the “regulatory” or rules-and-systems elements behind language  use, is indeed given a different spin within online talk. Here it proves possible, again and again, from method to method – across the seven case studies “speech communities”, to reveal tightly regulated, recurrent and systematic talk practices, variant from those observable offline, even where there are equivalent interest or topic groups. Wedge 2 indicates those already established online practices which constitute the difference, and even expertise of online chat, this suggests that it may well be on its way to constituting its own “speech community/ies”.

But it is wedge 3: those descriptive features which reveal a markedly “open” or “creative” set of communicative behaviours online, which reveal how chat is being constituted. Here the evidence of complexity, semiotic and graphic play, consistent  relational focus and creative expertise introduces the dynamic energy of online communication. Favouring members and strategies and expertise which reveal skill and creativity and fast-paced interpretive  responsiveness.

Wedge 3 practices lead us on to the discourse-under formation of wedge 4 or discourse demanding continual enactment of familiarity, consensual strategies, relational work, and what CA would call “category maintenance” – of an exclusively “communal” kind.

Online chat, regardless of topic or the specifics of a participant group, appears directed to community itself. Not quite un-agentric as it dis-connects from action, it becomes meta-agentric: more about how to operate than about “what to do”, It is this, contrary to most contemporary public and media’s accounts,  richer in value than in projects. It is a discourse largely about itself.

Having completed the seven differently-focused case studies designed to investigate these issues, it is now possible to see the quite distinctive directions these questions raise and the concomitant ways in which equally distinctive “clusters” of research focus have proven to have arise. The studies move from the fine focus of what can now be seen as technological and methodological questions (turn-taking; meaning-making; observational study) to a comparative emphasis cultural sensitivity in chat and in real-life talk; chat as reflective of real-life discourses; chat in comparison to natural conversation to the “postulatory” emphasis of much broader questions (chat as a useful area for new conversational research theory; chat as a new universal language). My own preliminary thinking indicated a three part study program, moving from existing linguistic-based observational and analytical methods, to an empirical evidence-founded description of actual online “talk” practice, and so to a deeper and richer set of hypotheses relating to online “chat” practices and behaviours. The study has thus begun the first stage of a methodological design for the study of chat – and perhaps of its future technologisations. The ODAM or Online Discourse Analysis Method proposed at the outset has evolved across the seven constitutive Case Studies:

case study 1 to case study 7 flow

5.3 Research Questions and answers

Having revealed them both a tendency towards community-specific chat behaviours and at least the foundations for “chat universals”, it is time to revisit the research questions which orginally drove this project. How have they contriubted to, or contrained the findings?  The five initial focus areas for this study were as follows:

  1. Is meaning communicated in chatrooms?
  2. How is turn-taking negotiated within chatrooms?
  3. Are issues of cultural sensitivity as relevant as in face-to-face talk?
  4. How is electronic chat reflective of current social discourses?
  5. Will chat become a universally understood language?

Added to these mixed and incommensurable questions were an equally multi-level listing of my then-current assumptions on online communication:

  1. That people create a different textual self for the chatroom environment that they are in
  2. That conversation within chatrooms will change how we come to know others
  3. That ‘chat’ does not differ from natural conversation
  4. That observational studies of chatroom conversation can capture some of the adaptations of conversational behaviours
  5. That this work gives us a better understanding of how and why chatrooms are an important area in which  to create a new conversational research theory

Terrell Neuage 2005

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS   Leigh Neuage 6th July 1983 - 16th August 2003         every place I go I go with you ~ thanks for being always with me always. I only wish I could be with you. Everyday is more difficult than the one before. 04 September 2010.

 

A few of my social sites that I post to... being a private person I have only listed a few of ones I am willing to share - what about you?  blogs from the past couple of decades
Wordpress (blog), would you join me on Facebook? Well why not? Facebook, youtube Youtube, Daily Motion Rocks Daily Motion, e publishing ePub, travels in and out of Australia physically emotionally metaphysically with two old fartssubstack, Flilckr Flicker, live journalLive Journal, FourSquare Foursquare, Screencast Screencast, twitter Twitter , wow we are so trendy Instagram , linkedin - for all you not mes Linkedin, I put so much here you can spend a lifetime sorting - I have
Pinterest, 100% uncensored social media Wimkin, one of those caffine type of sites - new social thingy - I will get involved tomorrow Caffeine, WT Social, Goodreads, github

tumblr, myportfolio, Behance nonsensical right wing alternative to twitter and facebook gab got a question well i had an answer for you - long ago and far away Quora reddit deviant art the best of my stuff once upon a time
deviant art,

chat room - always here come on inMeWe, this where I write all my code - it is all here to share with you as I am tired of making millions of dollars off of these codescoderwall, hacker news Hacker News, fiverr fiverr, something Japanese Kakao, my Russian connection VK, another Russian thingy OK, skyrocket Skyrocket, MIX, I had forgotten about this one - used it many years ago Pathbrite, books published on the Must RFead platform MustRead, my space used to be great now it is shit MySpace, all the books of Terrell Neuage in one groovy place Amazon by Terrell, what???????/ ZoomInfo, FDNitter really is twitter FDNitter. my daily podcast Spreaker, adobe education exchangecargo