Conversational Analysis of Chat Room Talk

PhD Thesis by Dr. Terrell Neuage, University of South Australia

Abstract

This PhD thesis by Dr. Terrell Neuage explores conversational analysis in chat room talk, focusing on discourse analysis, semiotics, and hypertext. The study examines how online communication shapes meaning and interaction, drawing on theories like Bohm Dialogue and debate paradigms.

Introduction

The introduction outlines the scope of the thesis, addressing the evolution of online communication and its impact on linguistic and social structures.

Methodology

The methodology section details the approaches used, including discourse analysis, corpus analysis, and linguistic relativity, to analyze chat room interactions.

Literature Review

The literature review covers key theories and scholars, such as Roland Barthes, Umberto Eco, Jürgen Habermas, and Julia Kristeva, focusing on semiotics, intertextuality, and hypertext.

Case Studies

This section includes seven case studies analyzing specific chat room interactions, exploring themes like chunk and chat segments, lurking, and communicative intent.

Discussion

The discussion synthesizes findings, comparing Bohm Dialogue and debate paradigms to evaluate their effectiveness in generating usable meaning in online contexts.

Conclusion

The conclusion summarizes the thesis findings and their implications for understanding online communication and meaning-making.

Bibliography

The bibliography includes references to works by Barthes, Eco, Habermas, Kristeva, and others, as well as resources on discourse ethics and semiotics.

Glossary

The glossary defines key terms used in the thesis, such as discourse analysis, intertextuality, hypertext, and linguistic relativity.

Research Notes

Cognitive Critic Metaparadigm (25/09/98)

Notes from reading "Cognitive Critic Metaparadigm" explore the role of debate critics versus Bohm Dialogue in communication. Bohm Dialogue is described as free-flowing, fostering new perspectives, while debate paradigms focus on defending or conquering, often lacking humor.

Key points: