Neuage – PhD research into conversational
analysis of chat room talk – this page is a very rough draft. Individual case studies and other areas are
being worked on at various times. 30-Jan-02
Conversational Analysis of Chat Room Talk PHD thesis by Dr. Terrell Neuage University of South Australia National Library of Australia. THESIS COMPLETE .pdf / or THESIShome ~ Abstract.html/pdf ~ Glossary.html/pdf ~ Introduction.html/pdf ~ methodology.html/pdf ~ literature review.html/pdf ~ Case
Study 1.html/pdf~ 2.html/pdf~ 3.html/pdf~ 4.html/pdf~ 5.html/pdf~ 6.html/pdf~ 7.html/pdf~ discussion.html/pdf ~ conclusion.html~ postscipt.html/pdf~ O*D*A*M.html/pdf~ Bibliography.html/pdf~ 911~ thesis-complete.htm/~ Terrell Neuage Home
Acknowledgements
|
Back to Introduction of
Britney Spears chat room
General
chat in a topic specific chatroom -Britney Spears Chat Room 'Chat
Room '4/01/00 (case study 5) Wednesday, 30 January 2002 return to case study five index to thesis mappings
INTRODUCTION TO METHODS
Theory investigated: Pragmatics [i]
Pragmatics
Analytical
tools developed in pragmatics have found frequent application in discourse
analysis. Much of Pragmatics grew out of Natural Language Philosophy: Wittgenstein “meaning as
use” and “language games”
In this case study I will use pragmatics to examine
the utterances in the turn-taking exchanges.
Pragmatics examines. “…the problem of how listeners
uncover speakers' intentions…” (McArthur 1992). In pragmatics research
speech acts and semantic formulas are difficult to define; therefore, it is
difficult to develop means in which to categorize semantic formulas. This case
study will code the turn-taking sequences to find discourse markers in order to
establish the role of a speakers’ intention in a chat room.
As communication analysis is an investigation into
meaning generation, pragmatics
Pragmatics
is sometimes included into systemic semantics. (I will discuss this briefly in
case study six – baseball
chat when I am looking at different linguistic schools of research)
De Saussure[ii]
constitutes a
key work for whoever is interested in the language and the languages; it is
regarded as founder of modern linguistics. It is there that are expressed for
the first time certain of the most fertile concepts of linguistics: binary
oppositions (langue/parole, signifiant/signifié, synchronie/diachronie),
arbitrary of the sign. These concepts will be largely refined or disputed, and
will nourish the reflexion of generations of linguists.
Semantics
is divided into three components:
The Lexico-Grammar concerns the syntactic
organisation of words into utterances. Even here, a functional approach is
taken, involving analysis of the utterance in terms of roles such as Actor,
Agent/Medium, Theme Mood, etc. (See Halliday 1994 for full description).
I will also briefly examine how emotions are too a
‘representation of meaning’ or ‘semantic representation’. This notion of meaning representation
borrows from Noam Chomsky’s ”Form and meaning in Natural Language” (Augenstein
1969)
New approaches to pragmatics include studies of:
Ø Optimality theory (OT) [iii]
Ø Extensions of Lexical Semantics[iv]
Ø Extensions of classical pragmatic approaches
Optimality
theory (OT) The acquisition of syntax and phonology. Optimality Theory (OT) is based solely on constraints which are
employed in such a way that derivation is a secondary aspect of the language
process.
Table one are the types of phrases used (ie. Greeting, answers etc) in the Britney Spears chat room.
Table two denotes abbreviation, emoticon and the beginning of threads of conversation in the Britney Spears chat room.
Table three are the user names of the participants in the Britney Spears chat room.
Table four is the raw data as it occurred in the Britney Spears chat room.
Table five lists the utterances used without user name or other coding devices in the Britney Spears chat room.
Table seven are all
words in the Britney Spears chat room separated in order of appearance in the
chat room.
Table eight
are the words in alphabetic order as well as number of occurrences for each
word and word type.
Next analysis
[i] Pragmatics
1. As
originally developed, the study of the relationship between the signs used
(words, expressions, etc.) and the uses of them.
2. [1930s:
from Greek pragmatikós, from prâgma
matter in hand, action, on the analogy of linguistics].
A branch of linguistics which originally examined the problem of how listeners
uncover speakers' intentions. It is sometimes defined as the study of 'speaker
meaning', as opposed to linguistic meaning: the utterance I'm
thirsty might need to be interpreted as Go and buy me
a drink and should not necessarily be taken at face value as a simple
statement. The term is usually attributed to the British philosopher Charles
Morris (1938 - 71), who distinguished between syntax
(the relations of signs to one another), semantics
(the relations of signs to objects), and pragmatics
(the relations of signs to interpretations). Recently, pragmatics has expanded
into a wide and somewhat vague topic which includes anything relating to the
way in which people communicate that cannot be captured by conventional
linguistic analysis. Within pragmatics, discourse analysis
(the study of language in discourse) has become a major focus of attention. The
Oxford Companion to the English Language, © Tom McArthur 1992 online:
http://www.xrefer.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=443464
30
January 2002
3. More recently, due largely to the work of
Austin and Searle in the 1950s and 1960s, a rather general endeavor
encompassing philosophical, linguistic, sociological and psychological aspects
of the use and effects of verbal signs and forms. Pragmatics differs from most
other areas of linguistic endeavor in its emphasis on the function of various
language forms rather than on the forms alone. Pragmatics is often equated with
speech-act theory, although it should be noted that the latter is more properly
only one theory of pragmatics. The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology, © Arthur S. Reber 1995
online: http://www.xrefer.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=154233&secid=.-
30
January 2002
3. Semantics [1890s: from
French sémantique, Greek semantikós
significant, from sêma a sign]. The study of meaning.
The term has at least five linked senses: (1) Sometimes semasiology.
In linguistics, the study of the meaning of words and sentences, their
denotations, connotations, implications, and ambiguities. The three levels or
components of a common model of language are phonology, syntax, and semantics.
(2) In philosophy, the study of logical expression and of the principles that
determine the truth or falsehood of sentences. (3) In semiotics, the study of
signs and what they refer to, and of responses to those signs. (4) In general
usage, interest in the meanings of words, including their denotations,
connotations, implications, and ambiguities. (5) Informally and often
pejoratively, the making of (pedantic and impractical) distinctions about the
meaning and use of words.
Every aspect
of meaning which cannot be stated in truth-conditional terms is pragmatics; the distinction is close to that of sentence
and utterance meaning. But there are problems with this distinction and with
the exclusion of reference. Thus, such deictic relationships as here/there and this/that, and
words such as today and the personal pronouns, appear
to contribute to sentence meaning, yet depend for their interpretation on
reference, which varies according to the identity of speaker and hearer and the
time and place of the utterance. The Oxford Companion to the
English Language, © Tom McArthur 1992 online: http://www.xrefer.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=443786&secid=.8.-
30
January 2002
[ii] Ferdinand
de Saussure (1857-1913) is usually
considered to be the father of modern linguistics. Born in Geneva into an
illustrious family that included famous natural scientists, Saussure trained as
a comparative philologist, studying (1876-78) in Leipzig, the main center of
the Neogrammatical movement. There he gave precocious proof of his genius with
a Mémoire (1879) containing insights that lie at the root of some of
the most interesting twentieth-century developments in comparative philology.
After a period of studying and teaching in Paris (1880-91), Saussure was called
in 1891 to teach Sanskrit in Geneva. He published relatively little in his
lifetime (see his Recueil 1922). Between 1907 and 1911, he taught
three courses in general linguistics to small groups of students. After his
death, two of his colleagues (Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, with the help
of one of his students, Albert Riedlinger), on the basis of students' lecture
notes and some of Saussure's own jottings, compiled a coherent Cours de linguistique générale (CLG;
1916). It proved to be perhaps the most influential text in linguistics, at
least up to the publication of Noam Chomsky's work. Cut from http://cognet.mit.edu/MITECS/Entry/lepschy
accessed Wednesday, 30 January 2002
[iii]
Optimality Theory Theory of constraints in phonology, floated in the
early to mid-1990s, in which any universal constraint on the form that units
can take is capable, in principle, of being broken; in any particular case,
however, the constraints will be arranged in a hierarchy from least readily to
most readily broken, and their optimal application to forms in a particular
language can be computed from this. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics, © Oxford
University Press 1997 online: http://www.xrefer.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=572531&secid=.-
30 January 2002
[iv]
Lexical Semantics A term in linguistics for the
study of the meaning of words, phrases, and lexemes, especially in sets rather
than in isolation. See Lexical Field/Set, Semantics. [Language]. T.McA. The
Oxford Companion to the English Language, © Tom McArthur 1992 online:
http://www.xrefer.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=442733&secid=.-
30
January 2002
|
|||
View My Stats