Tables from Case Studies
Table 01 Case Study + Theory +
word count
Table 4
Greets/Statements/Answers/Questions %
|
Theory used |
Case study |
Title |
Chat-log |
# of users |
Turns recorded |
# words[1] |
|||
|
Reader-Response Theory |
45 |
279 |
2001 |
||||||
|
Reading Theory - (also - hypertextuality) |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Speech Act (SA) theory |
Astrology 'chat' ---- |
16 |
85 |
|
|||||
|
Discourse Analysis (DA) |
11 |
89 |
|
||||||
|
Conversational Analysis (CA) |
8 |
511 |
|
||||||
|
Semiotics (Pragmatics) |
17 |
70 |
297 |
||||||
|
Linguistic schools of thought |
13 |
155 |
570 |
||||||
|
|
Chapter 7 |
IM |
|
2 |
|
|
|||
|
110 |
1189 |
|
|
||||||
|
TABLE ONE |
Highest |
Lowest |
Averg. |
|
A/ = greetings or salutations |
5 (30) |
3 (01) |
12% |
|
B/ = statement- open no one in
particular, ever who is in the chatroom |
1 (40) |
4 (09) |
20% |
|
C/ = statement - to someone named or
previous (earlier) speaker |
3 (62) |
1 (18) |
38% |
|
D/ = answer - to someone named or
previous (earlier) speaker |
6 (19) |
05 % |
11% |
|
E/ = answer - open - to ever who is in
the chatroom |
5 (05) |
6 (01) |
01% |
|
F/ = question - open - to anyone - ever
who is in the chatroom |
1 (08) |
4 (01) |
04% |
|
G/ = question - to someone specific or
previous (earlier) speaker |
1 (13) |
5 (01) |
07% |
|
?/ = undetermined or not classifiable by
one of the criteria above |
4 (08) |
6 (03) |
05% |
|
** = uses abbreviations such as lol |
3 (30) |
5 (05) |
|
|
*) = uses emoticons in places of words
or identify |
5 (05) |
6 (03) |
|
|
CS |
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
? |
*) |
** |
|
1 |
STORM (Reader) |
14 .05% |
103 .40% |
47 .18% |
30 .12% |
3 .01% |
21 .08% |
34 .13% |
3 .01% |
1 |
2 |
|
2. |
IM (CMC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
SPEARS (Semiotics) |
1 .01% |
11 .16% |
43 .62% |
5 .05% |
|
2 .03% |
6 .07% |
.06% |
4 (.06%) |
(21) 30% |
|
4 |
ASTROCHAT (SA) |
9 .11% |
15 .19% |
25 .32% |
13 .16% |
|
1 .01% |
8 .10% |
.08% |
|
|
|
5 |
TALK CITY (DA) |
16 .30% |
5 .09% |
16 .30% |
6 .11% |
3 .05% |
3 .05% |
1 .01% |
.05% |
.05% |
.05% |
|
6 |
WEB3D (CA) |
42 .11% |
89 .22% |
148 .37% |
75 .19% |
3 .01% |
24 .06% |
7 .02% |
.03% |
.03% |
.06% |
|
7. |
BASEBALL (Schools) |
15 .16% |
14 .15% |
42 .46% |
5 .05% |
|
3 .03% |
6 .07% |
.07% |
|
|
|
|
average |
.12% |
.20% |
.38% |
.11% |
.01% |
.04% |
.07% |
.05% |
|
|
|
TABLE Four |
||||||
|
CS |
|
Greetings |
Statements |
Answers |
Questions |
? |
|
1 |
STORM (Reader) |
.05% |
.58% |
.13% |
.21% |
.03% |
|
2. |
IM (CMC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
SPEARS (Semiotics) |
.01% |
.78% |
.05% |
.10% |
.06% |
|
4 |
ASTROCHAT (SA) |
.11% |
.51% |
.16% |
.11% |
.11% |
|
5 |
TALK CITY (DA) |
.30% |
.39% |
.16% |
.06% |
.09% |
|
6 |
WEB3D (CA) |
.11% |
.59% |
.20% |
.08% |
.02% |
|
7. |
BASEBALL (Schools) |
.16% |
.61% |
.05% |
.10% |
.08% |
|
|
average |
.12% |
.58% |
.12% |
.11% |
.07% |
[1] Number of words are words written – including abbreviations. User names and emoticons are not included.